ks. Ryszard Zawadzki
The Prayer of Jesus on the Cross
The God of the Bible reveals Himself, in the reflexion of faith developed by the inspired authors of the Old and New Testament, as a helpful Presence, a spiritual Nearness. The spontaneous human reaction in the face of this presence and nearness of God is turning to Him in the act of prayer. It forms an expression of the deep aspiration to respond with reciprocity: the praying individual desires to abide with God, to be present for Him, to come spiritually nearer to God and to remain unceasingly in an intimate, life-giving communion with Him.
That desire becomes especially piercing when a human person has to face various forms of suffering. Experiencing his own frailty and insufficiency, he seeks to find a support outside of himself and turns with his whole being towards God – the source of true life, inner peace and happiness. Such radical turning to God, such total clinging to Him, may find its expression in a form of prayer that is able to engage all spheres and dimensions of a person.
In the message of the New Testament, a peculiar culmination of human experience of suffering is the passion of Jesus Christ. His suffering appears as unique, exceptional and unrepeated because of His identity and His dignity: He is a human and at the same time the Son of God. Therefore His suffering on the one hand reflects and incorporates the universal suffering of the mankind in the history, on the other hand it proves salutary for our world.
Since the passion narrative constitutes an essential part of each gospel, all four Evangelists report, in more or less detail, the final events of Jesus’ life, His crucifixion and death on the cross. Placing Him in centre stage as protagonist in the drama of passion, they present Him not as a passive, silent convict, condemned to death, but rather as an autonomous individual accomplishing consciously and actively the mystery of salvation.
An outstanding expression of the afore-mentioned consciousness and autonomy of Jesus in His passion is found in His prayer on the cross. Among all the words spoken by the crucified Christ the ones directed to His Father, that is to say the words of His prayer, are presented in the passion narratives as particularly significant. The Evangelists portray Jesus on the cross not only as Messias patiens, but also as Messias orans. This long expected Messiah is the one who prays even in the situation of extreme suffering during his crucifixion. In its verbal as well as its nonverbal dimension, that prayer expresses His total submission to the will of His Father and demonstrates that the sacrifice of His life was perfectly voluntary (cf. Jn 10:18).
In the considerations below we are going to reflect on the gospel texts (passion narratives) portraying the crucified Jesus as an Orant and reporting His prayer on the cross. Before we focus our attention, as a main point, on the words and phrases of prayer uttered by the Crucified, we will first consider some nonverbal aspects of His prayer.
Nonverbal dimension of Jesus’ prayer
All four Evangelists in their passion narratives recount the crucifixion of Jesus using the verb stauro,w, with the meaning “nail (affix) to the cross” (“ans Kreuz schlagen”). Through that act of brutally affixing the body of Jesus to the wooden instrument of death, the Roman soldiers force Him to assume a specific position on the cross. So the execution’s tool itself determines the bodily posture of the Messias orans.
In this regard our particular attention is drawn to the association between crucifixion and prayer, created by the image of extended hands. The gesture of outstretched hands, conveyed in the New Testament by the use of the verb evktei,nw, may concern a crucified person, but also can symbolize the disposition of an orant. Viewed from the perspective of this association, we can see in the posture of the crucified Jesus the first form of His nonverbal prayer and at the same time a silent preamble to His words of prayer uttered on the cross.
Another form of Jesus’ nonverbal prayer seems to be indicated in two texts of the passion narratives, where all four Evangelists, reporting the very moment of His death, mention a cry uttered by the Crucified Jesus without relating its verbal content. Matthew says: o` de. VIhsou/j pa,lin kra,xaj fwnh/| mega,lh| avfh/ken to. pneu/ma (27:50) and Mark o` de. VIhsou/j avfei.j fwnh.n mega,lhn evxe,pneusen (15:37). Both aorist participles (kra,xaj, avfei.j) have as their object a “loud voice” (fwnh. mega,lh) – the potential medium of an inarticulate but powerful and – in the eyes of both Evangelists – significant agony-prayer uttered in a terminal experience of excruciation.
Verbal dimension of Jesus’ prayer
Among the sayings of Jesus on the cross, traditionally known as His “Seven Last Words”, only three can be qualified as prayer in the proper sense of this word: Lk 23:34a; Mt 27:46 / Mk 15:34 and Lk 23:46. We will now focus our attention on these sayings, in the above order.
As mentioned above, the first of the traditional “Seven Last Words of Jesus” is the saying recorded in Lk 23:34a. Its form is clearly one of prayer; nevertheless in the narrative introduction to the words of Jesus there appears the verbal form e;legen (“was saying”), derived from le,gw (“to say, to speak, to tell”) and not from eu;comai (“to pray”). His request, expressed through the imperative a;fej auvtoi/j (“forgive them”) is directed to God – His Father (the vocative pa,ter).
The present context of that prayer of Jesus might suggest, as noted by Pope Benedict XVI, that it was “spoken almost at the very moment when the act of crucifixion was being carried out”. So His plea for the forgiveness of those who treat Him thus: pa,ter( a;fej auvtoi/j( ouv ga.r oi;dasin ti, poiou/sin (“Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do”) initiates both the verbal and nonverbal prayer of Jesus on the cross.
The prayer draws upon Old Testament theological theme of the unjust suffering of an innocent righteous one, while at the same time going beyond the OT concepts. Here Jesus as the “suffering upright one obtains forgiveness from his Father for those who make him suffer both physically and mentally”.
This supplicatory appeal of Jesus, directed to His Father at the beginning of crucifixion, bears the traits of an essential, programmatic and normative character in respect to His passion. The self-immolation of the “Lamb of God” (Jn 1:29,36) constitutes an act of expiation for sinful humanity. The words of supplication, spoken by the Crucified: “Father, forgive them”, appear in perfect harmony with the expiatory, concomitant act of redemption on the cross. Jesus is presented as an ideal pattern-figure of intercession prayer who perfectly fulfils His own teaching concerning love of enemies and persecutors (Mt 5:44; Lk 6:27-29).
The plea of Jesus – the divine Intercessor pa,ter( a;fej auvtoi/j (“Father, forgive them”) leads us to ask an essential question: who here is being prayed for? In other words: who are the “they” who “do not know what they are doing”?
Benedict XVI, referring to the scene of crucifixion itself, states initially that the Lord “begs forgiveness for those who nail him to the Cross”. Later on however, the Pope moves on to consider Saint Peter’s sermon in the Acts of the Apostles, citing his words directed to the crowd gathered in the temple of Jerusalem: «You “killed the Author of life, whom God raised from the dead” (3:15) […] “Now, brethren, I know that you acted in ignorance, as did also your rulers” (3:17)».
Thus, moving in the direction of the Lucan theology, Benedict XVI extends the circle of people referred to in Jesus’ intercession to include the Jewish populace and their rulers involved in His crucifixion. The detailed exegetical analysis undertaken by many authors corroborates this opinion: Christ prays both for the Roman soldiers who physically affix Him to the cross (and for Roman authorities represented by Pilate) as well as for Jews, especially the Jewish leaders who are mainly responsible for what was (i.e. the trial of Jesus) and is (i.e. the crucifixion) being done.
Continuing His supplication to His Father for forgiveness, Jesus adds a justification of the perpetrators who “do not know what they are doing” (ouv ga.r oi;dasin ti, poiou/sin). In the light of Lucan theology the justification is applicable to the culprits belonging to both the Romans and the Jews, taking into consideration their respective roles in Jesus’ death.
It seems necessary, in this regard, to discern between two kinds of ignorance. The first one has a rather pure material character and refers to the Roman soldiers and to Pilate. In the theological perspective of Luke they, as heathen, play merely the role of an instrument in the hands of Jewish rulers manipulating the emotions of Jerusalem’s populace. The ignorance of the latter is the formal one: they have full material knowledge and theological awareness regarding the messianic prophecies and expectations of Judaism at the time of Jesus. But nevertheless they not only reject His proclamation and despise Him, but also deliberately seek to kill Him. Their ignorance therefore is an obdurate ignorance. However, in the eyes of Luke – the theologian, the representatives of both kinds of ignorance need forgiveness. Therefore the Evangelist, alone among the Synoptics, presents Christ on the cross as Intercessor (Orant). In “the Word of Forgiveness” He implores His Father’s mercy for all those who contribute to His crucifixion.
Mk 15:34 / Mt 27:46
While the first expression of Jesus’ prayer on the cross is uttered by Him at the beginning of the crucifixion, the second (and the third) one is pronounced at the end of His being “lifted up from the earth” (Jn 12:32).
That central phrase of the Crucified’s prayer, collocated between the initial and the final ones, belongs to the very heart of the passion narrative. Moving forward towards the report of the death of Jesus it introduces, as antecedent circumstance, the motif of darkness spreading at noon over the whole earth / over all the earth (Mk 15:33 / Mt 27:45) until Christ’s expiration at the ninth hour (i.e. about 3 p.m.).
It is precisely from the midst of this deep darkness that Jesus utters His dramatic outcry of prayer: “«El?i, El?i, lema sabachthani» ” which is interpreted, «My God, my God, why did you abandon me?»” / “«?li, ?li, lema sabachthani» ” – that is, «My God, my God, why did you abandon me?»” (Mk 15:34 / Mt 27:46). Because of its content as well as its literary form it appears as the most distinguishable and conspicuous one among all the Seven Last Words of Jesus and also among all His phrases of prayer on the cross.
Let us enumerate the principal specific features of “The Word of Abandonment” as it was traditionally called.
First of all it is the only saying that occurs in more than one gospel. Then, as double-attested, both in Mk and in Mt the saying is first cited in Aramaic transcription and subsequently translated into Greek. And finally the formulation of the prayer as such has its direct source in Ps 22:2.
The fact that both Mk 15:34 and Mt 27:46 contain two wordings of the dramatic invocation of Jesus gives a proof for its considerable importance in the synoptic tradition. Mark as well as Matthew report Jesus’ final words on the cross (for both of them His only words in this context) in the first place as transliteration of the Semitic in Greek characters and then as translation of the import of the saying into Greek.
The transcribed citation of Jesus’ cry, in spite of differences in formulation, indicates clearly Ps 22:2a as its textual source. Jesus’ supplication is coincident with the initial verse of Psalm 22 – Israel’s great cry of anguish addressed to the apparently silent God. The psalmist prays from the midst of his suffering on account of God’s seeming absence: “My God, my God, why have you abandoned me (ynIT"b.z:)?” The transcription sabacqani, common for Mk and Mt, resembles the Aramaic version of the verb rather than the Hebrew one, i.e. that of the psalm.
The translation of the Semitic version of Jesus’ prayer into Greek suggests that not only the Marcan audience, but also that of Matthew was no longer expected to understand the original wording. Both Evangelists seem to reach, in their respective formulation of the translation, to the LXX–version of Ps 22:2a (o` qeo,j mou is the common part with Mk, and i[na ti, me evgkate,lipej - the one with Mt) however retaining also some signs of a close relation to the Hebrew.
Introducing Jesus’ “at (Mk) / about (Mt) the ninth hour” prayer, Mark and Matthew alike picture it not as a simple calling out or pleading but as a loud shout. Described as experiencing extreme anguish, the Crucified “screamed with a loud cry” (evbo,hsen fwnh/| mega,lh|) / “screamed out with loud cry, saying” (avnebo,hsen fwnh/| mega,lh| le,gwn). The striking character of this invocation is of central importance for the message of Mk/Mt passion narratives and corresponds strictly to the tonality of Ps 22 as the OT-source of the prayer’s wording and messianic prophecy pointing to Christ.
This time however, in contrast to both remaining prayers from the cross (Lk 23:34a,46) He calls the one He speaks to not “Father” (pa,ter) but “My God” (o` qeo,j mou - Mk / qee, mou - Mt). “Feeling forsaken as if he were not being heard, he no longer presumes to speak intimately to the All-Powerful as “Father” but employs the address common to all human beings, «My God»” as it does the psalmist at the beginning of Ps 22. In this way Jesus identifies himself with all supplicants of the universe who have to experience an extreme anguish, especially with “all those in this world who suffer from God’s concealment”.
Screaming out His dramatic interrogation from the cross Jesus is not questioning, however, “the existence of God or the power of God to do something about what is happening”. What is He questioning is the silence of “His God”. Nevertheless His prayer isn’t a cry of despair but an expression of hope, a demonstration of an unwavering faith, corresponding to His extreme anguish and helplessness.
So the Crucified appears as the Intercessor par excellence: all those who feel they must suffer under “God’s darkness”, i.e. suffer God’s absence, God’s abandonment, in a painful forlorn state, who experience loneliness and alienation, should be certain and convinced that He, God’s Son tormented on the cross, suffers this abandonment together with them.
The final prayer of Jesus on the cross coincides with the culmination of the Lucan passion narrative. Its climax is formed by the report of the very moment of Christ’s death.
Agreeing that “in any good drama the last words of the main character are especially significant” we should see the essential difference between Mk/Mt and Lk. While the moribund Jesus in Mk/Mt expires crying out to God the desperate “Why?” of His abandonment, Luke – in contrast – portrays the dying Christ instead with a strong, trustful prayer on His lips, free from apprehension. So the Lucan portrayal of Jesus’ e;xodoj (Lk 9:31) from this world, His transit to the Father, scarcely evokes in the reader’s mind any potential association with the “terror of death” that would be the case regarding the dramatic presentation in Mk/Mt.
Another difference, this time a compositional one, is Luke’s joining (in 23:44-45, before Jesus dies) of “the darkness over the whole earth with the rending of the sanctuary veil – two signs that Mark had inclusively placed on either side of the death. Through this rearrangement the two ominous divine interventions constitute one vignette to which Jesus reacts by an act of confidence in God’s loving care” as He prays: “Father, into your hands I commend (entrust) my spirit” (23:46).
These words of deep trust appear however, at the same time, as words expressing the (spiritual) strength of the Crucified. The latter feature of Jesus’ final prayer is expressed by the Lucan introduction to it: kai. fwnh,saj fwnh/| mega,lh| o` VIhsou/j ei=pen (lit. “and having voiced with a great voice, Jesus said”). Using the hendiadys fwnh,saj fwnh/| Luke on the one hand emphasizes the strong character of Jesus’ calling with a loud (mega,lh – lit. “great”) cry, on the other softens the Marcan evbo,hsen (“screamed”) introducing the prayer of dereliction (15:34). In contrast to the prayer in Lk 23:34a, introduced by the imperfect form e;legen, indicating the iterative or durative aspect of it, here Luke uses the aorist ei=pen expressing the punctual, unreiterated character of Jesus’ confiding declaration.
Its wording is identical with the LXX version of Ps 31,6 save for the form of the verb (present tense parati,qemai instead of paraqh,somai – future tense) and addition of the vocative pa,ter (“Father”) as part of the citation.
The psalmist, praying for deliverance from enemies and expressing his confidence in God, invokes Him in the second half of the verse 6 as “Lord, God of truth” (ku,rie o` qeo.j th/j avlhqei,aj - tm,(a/ laeä hw"©hy>). This form of addressing God used by the psalmist, in the Lucan citation of Ps 31:6 is substituted by the intimate address “Father” on the lips of Jesus, and placed emphatically at the beginning of His prayer. It is not the first time in Lk that Jesus, praying, addresses God in such a way (using the vocative pa,ter). As regards the Lucan passion narrative, the address “Father” in Jesus’ prayer creates two inclusions. The broader one is opened in 22:42 when He, entering His passion, prays on the Mount of Olives: “Father, if it is Your will, take this cup away from Me”, while the nearer one opens with the prayer of Crucified: “Father, forgive them for they do not know what they are doing” (23:34a). Both inclusions terminate in His death cry expressing the final words of trust (23:46); “now the climax of that mode of filial prayer is reached”.
The figurative expression “into your hands” (eivj cei/ra,j sou) belongs to the category of “hebraisierende Umschreibungen präpositionaler Begriffe” and forms a literal translation of the Hebrew term ^d>y"B. contained in the source of citation (Ps 31:6).The meaning of the expression can be rendered as “in your power (authority)” or simply “to you”. So the Son of Man who was going to be handed over to the power of (sinful) men (eivj cei/raj avnqrw,pwn (a`martwlw/n) – Lk 9:44; 24:7), proclaims at the fulfilment of His mission that it is into the hands of the Father himself that he “placed over” (parati,qemai) His spirit (to. pneu/ma, mou).
The term to. pneu/ma (x;Wr in Ps 31:6) is to be understood not “partially”, as a component of the human being. It is the whole of the living person, “the living self or life power that goes beyond death”. Taking into consideration the particular stress placed by Luke on the unique role of the Holy Spirit in Jesus’ life and mission, the expression “my spirit” (to. pneu/ma, mou) on His lips may suggest an intended, delicate allusion to the singular union between the spirit of Jesus and the Holy Spirit.
Through His final prayer on the cross Jesus expresses His supreme human dedication and ultimate devotion to His Father. Consequently, in the intent of Luke, He becomes an archetype of self-sacrifice for all generations of His disciples, particularly the martyrs.
The Lucan words of confidence (Ps 31:6) instead of the Marcan words of dereliction (Ps 22:2), quoted as the last prayer of Jesus on the cross, possibly have an additional explanation. The later–attested rabbinic tradition uses Ps 31:6 “as part of the evening prayer that a disciple should utter before going to sleep”. If that custom was already in vogue at Luke’s time and was adopted by his community, he could intend to portray Jesus on the cross also as pious Servant of God, praying the evening prayer of God-fearing people. However His prayer, uttered before the last sleep of death, appears unique as opened with the address “Father”.
Jesus’ death prayer, which takes the form of an announcement and not the one of a request, confidently proclaims that “the power of darkness” (Lk 22:53) has not been able to separate Him from His Father. This “Word of Reunion”, as it is traditionally called, constitutes in the Lucan theology the concluding fulfilment of Jesus’ life and mission as well as the victorious accomplishment of His salvific self-sacrifice.
The crucified Son of God, undergoing His vicarious and expiatory suffering, and at the same time praying on the cross, becomes not only an icon of Orant, an Intercessor par excellence but also an impersonated Intercession. The most sublime intercession is vicarious sacrificing of own life.
Jesus on the cross, stretching out His arms to embrace the whole of humanity and lifted up from the earth towards His heavenly Father, becomes an embodied, living and life-giving prayer.
The passion narratives of the synoptic gospels portray Jesus on the cross not only as Messias patiens, but also as Messias orans. The article undertakes an attempt to present the Synoptics’ portrait of the Crucified as an Orant.
The first part of the article deals with the nonverbal dimensions of Christ’s prayer on the cross, i.e. His bodily posture determined by the instrument of execution, and His wordless, loud cry of agony.
In the second part the analysis focuses on three out of “the Seven Last Words of Jesus” (the collection of sayings attributed to crucified Jesus, gathered from the four Canonical Gospels and attested since the 16th century in the Christian tradition), which in contrast to the other sayings can be qualified as prayer in the proper sense of this word: Lk 23:34a; Mt 27:46 / Mk 15:34 and Lk 23:46.
Keywords: passion narratives, Jesus, prayer, cross
W artykule zaprezentowana została Jezusowa modlitwa na krzyżu w ujęciu opisów męki zawartych w ewangeliach synoptycznych.
Pierwsza część rozważań dotyczy wymiarów niewerbalnych modlitwy Ukrzyżowanego, takich jak Jego wymuszona narzędziem egzekucji postawa ciała czy nieartykułowane słowami głośne wołanie.
W drugiej części przedmiotem analizy są te trzy spośród „siedmiu słów Jezusa na krzyżu” (zbiór funkcjonujący w tradycji duchowości chrześcijańskiej od XVI w.), które posiadają formę modlitwy: Łk 23,34a; Mk 15,34 / Mt 27,46; Łk 23,46.
 Cf. W. Grossouw, H. Haag “Gebet”, in: H. Haag (ed.), Bibel-Lexikon (Leipzig 41981) 516 - 522, 516.
 In the Christian tradition there is attested since the 16th century, a collection of seven phrases attributed to crucified Jesus, gathered from the four Canonical Gospels, called “the Seven Last Words of Jesus” (or “the Seven Last Words from the Cross”). Three of the sayings appear exclusively in Lk (23:34a,43,46) and another three occur exclusively in Jn (19:26-27,28,30). The seventh saying is double-attested (Mt 27:46; Mk 15:34), with small divergence in pronunciation – cf. J. Jaromin, “Siedem słów z krzyża”, Scriptura Sacra 12 (2008) 117-130; J. D. G. Dunn, Jesus Remembered (Christianity in the Making, vol. 1; Grand Rapids 2003) 777-781; F. Rutledge, The Seven Last Words from the Cross (Grand Rapids 2005) (spiritual meditations).
 Mt 27:35; Mk 15:24; Lk 23:33; Jn 19,18.
 W. Bauer, Griechisch-deutsches Wörterbuch zu den Schriften des Neuen Testaments und der frühchristlichen Literatur (Berlin 61988) 1528.
 With exception of Acts 27,30, the object of evktei,nw remains always a hand (Mt 8:3; 12:13,49; 14:31; 26:51; Mk 1:41; 3:5; Lk 5:13; 6:10; Acts 4,30; 26:1) or hands (Lk 22:53; Jn 21:18) – cf. E. Fuchs, “evktei,nw”, in: Theologisches Wörterbuch zum Neuen Testament II (1935), 458-463, 458.
 Cf. R. Schnackenburg, Das Johannesevangelium (Herders theologischer Kommentar zum Neuen Testament, IV/3, Freiburg 1975), 437-438; E. Fuchs, “evktei,nw”, 461.
 Cf. S. Mędala, Ewangelia według świętego Jana. Wstęp, przekład z oryginału, komentarz (NKB. NT, IV/2; Częstochowa 2010) 367-368 regarding the prediction of Jesus uttered to Peter in Jn 21:18. The author indicates several source texts, which associate both concepts – among other the Odes of Salomon: 27:1-3 and 42:1-2. We adduce below both texts in the translation of J. H. Charlesworth (“Odes of Salomon”, in: J. H. Charlesworth (ed.), The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha (New York 1985) II, 725-771, 759, 770):
“I extended my hands
and hallowed my Lord;
For the expansion of my hands
is his sign.
And my extension
is the upright cross.
“I extended my hands and approached my Lord,
because the stretching out of my hands is his sign.
And my extension is the common cross,
that was lifted up on the way of the Righteous One” (42:1-2).
 See the note 2.
 As regards the collocation of the logion, see the explanation of B. M. Metzger, A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, Stuttgart 22000, 154. An exhaustive study – regarding the strongly debated question whether the logion belongs originally to the text – offers R. E. Brown, The Death of the Messiah. From Gethsemane to the Grave. A Commentary on the Passion Narratives in the Four Gospels (New York 1994) II, 975-981 and N. Eubank, “A Disconcerting Prayer: On the Originality of Luke 23:34a”, JBL 129 (2010,3) 521-536.
 J. Ratzinger – pope Benedict XVI, Jesus of Nazareth. Holy Week: from the Entrance into Jerusalem to the Resurrection (San Francisco 2011) 206; see also A. Plummer, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel according to S. Luke (International Critical Commentary; Edinburgh 51922) 531; N. Eubank, “Prayer”, 527, n. 28.
 See, for example, Ps 59; Wis 2:12-20.
 J. A. Fitzmyer, The Gospel According to Luke. Introduction, Translation, and Notes (The Anchor Bible, 28-28A; New York 1981-1985) II, 1504.
 Reporting His plea of forgiveness Luke uses not the aorist ei=pen, but the imperfect form e;legen, indicating the iterative or durative aspect of Jesus’ action – cf. F. Blass - A. Debrunner - F. Rehkopf [Bearb.], Grammatik des neutestamentlichen Griechisch (Göttingen 171990) §§ 318,325,327,329. See also e.g. A. Plummer, Commentary, 531 (“while they crucified Him, He in contrast to them was saying”).
 J. Ratzinger – pope Benedict XVI, Jesus, 206.
 Ibid., 206-207.
 Further see Acts 13:26ff.
 Literally they are mentioned later on in the account, making a mockery of the Crucified in 23:36, but the context clearly indicates them as doers of the physical execution.
 R. E. Brown, Death, 973 observes rightly: “Luke never presents the Romans as solely responsible for the crucifixion” (see e.g. Acts 2,23) and continues: “the chief priests and the rulers and the people” (i.e. the Jewish agents of 23:13) “are the last-mentioned antecedent for any “they” in the crucifixion”.
 Cf. A. Plummer, Commentary, 531; J. A. Fitzmyer, Gospel, II, 1503-1504; N. Eubank, “Prayer”, 527-528.
 Cf. A. Plummer, Commentary, 532; the author indicates Lk 12:48 as throwing some light on Jesus’ excuse. R. E. Brown, Death, II, 973-974 adduces also some OT (e.g. Jon 4:11) and apocryphal texts.
 J. Ratzinger – pope Benedict XVI, Jesus, 207 illustrates that “mixture of knowledge and ignorance, of material expertise and deep incomprehension” which can compose a spiritual mystery of human heart, mentioning the autobiographical reflexions of Saint Paul who firstly «recalls that he himself “formerly blasphemed and persecuted and insulted” Jesus; then he continues: “but I received mercy because I had acted ignorantly in unbelief” (1 Tim 1:13».
 So the first saying of Jesus on the cross is traditionally called.
 In the tradition of “The Seven Last Words from the Cross” this is the fourth, middle saying (the second one is Lk 23:43 and the third – Jn 19:26-27).
 Lk 23:46.
 Cf. the detailed treatment of that theme in R.E. Brown, Death, II, 1034-1038. The author handles widely the OT theological background, indicating, among many others, the text of Amos 8:9-10: “And on that day, says the Lord God, the sun shall set at midday, and the light shall be darkened on earth in the daytime. […] I will make them mourn as for only son and bring their day to bitter end”. R.E. Brown throws some interesting light on the question of darkness also from the apocryphal Gospel of Peter.
 The “sixth hour” in Mk/Mt text means the sixth hour of the day and is the equivalent of midday.
 The essentially theological perspective of Mk/Mt suggests rather the meaning “earth” than “land” or “country” for the noun gh/ used in the scene – see the excellent discussion in R. E. Brown, Death, II, 1036 and R. H. Gundry, Mark. A Commentary on His Apology for the Cross (Grand Rapids 1993) 964.
 See R. H. Gundry, Mark, 947.
 It is very probable that both gospels are using rather mixed forms of the phrase – partially Aramaic and partially Hebrew; on details see R.E. Brown, Death, II, 1052-1053.
 Cf. C. L . Blomberg, “Matthew”, in: G. K. Beale – D. A. Carson (ed.), Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament, (Grand Rapids 2007) 98.
 On the “Elijah-misunderstanding” presented in the following Mk/Mt context as resulting from Jesus’ prayer - See R. E. Brown, Death, II, 1058-1063; R. Zawadzki, “«Ich sende meinen Boten vor dir her» (Mk 1,2): die Gestalt des Elija im Markusevangelium” Collectanea Theologica (Fasciculus specialis) 71 (2001) 40-44.
 Cf. J. Ratzinger – pope Benedict XVI, Jesus, 204.
 See R. E. Brown, Death, II, 1052 who adds as a side-note that in Jesus’ time transliteration of Semitic vowels and consonants was not an exact procedure and therefore can differ more or less from our standardized transcription of the Masoretic Text.
 Cf. R. E. Brown, Death, II, 1054.
 Small modification forms here the changed order of the two last words.
 The participle le,gwn (“saying”) refers here not to the manner in which the prayer was uttered but reflects solely the Semitic syntax of the phrase.
 The scream can lend – historically (as not unusual at crucifixion) – desperate urgency to Jesus’ petition, but first of all constitutes “an apocalyptic sign similar to the eschatological elements of darkness, rent sanctuary veil, earthquake, and risen dead that accompany the death of Jesus” - R. E. Brown, Death, II, 1044-1045. R. H. Gundry, Mark, 947-948 insists (mentioning it more times) that the loudness of Jesus’ cry emphasizes instead His “superhuman strength even as he expires”.
 The idea of roaring or crying to God comes back (beside of the v.2) in verses 3 and 6.
 In Gethsemane, at the beginning of the passion narrative, Jesus addresses God solely as “Father” – Mk 14:36 (abba o` path,r), Mt 26:39,42 (pa,ter mou).
 R. E. Brown, Death, II, 1046. The author refers also (p. 1056) to the rendition of Jesus’ last words in the apocryphal Gospel of Peter 5:19 (see above the note 25) as: “My Power, o power, you have forsaken me”, questioning the docetic background of the mentioned rendition (A. T. Robertson).
 J. Ratzinger – pope Benedict XVI, Jesus, 214.
 R. E. Brown, Death, II, 1046; see also A. Paciorek, Ewangelia według świętego Mateusza (NKB, NT I/2; Częstochowa 2008) II, 666-667.
 Cf. R. Pesch, Das Markusevangelium (Herders Theologischer Kommentar zum Neuen Testament, II/2; Freiburg 2000 (Sonderausgabe)) II, 495.
 According to Jn 19:30, before Jesus “gave over the spirit” (pare,dwken to. pneu/ma), said: “It is finished!” (tete,lestai) and this was His last word on the cross. But this word, as regards his form, isn’t one of prayer – cf. J. Ratzinger – pope Benedict XVI, Jesus, 223.
 R. E. Brown, Death, II, 1045.
 Cf. J. A. Fitzmyer, Gospel, II, 1512.1515.
 R. E. Brown, Death, II, 1033.
 It is not very probable that the phrase indicates two different actions i.e. crying out (wordless) and subsequent uttering of the prayer’s words. In this case the relative past (towards final verb) expressed usually by aorist participle is not valid and the latter qualifies the same action as the main verb – see F. Blass - A. Debrunner - F. Rehkopf [Bearb.], Grammatik, §§339,1; 420,3.
 A similar phrase, as regards the vocabulary employed, occurs also in Acts 16:28 (Paul calling with a loud voice).
 Taking into consideration that, between many prayers of Jesus reported hitherto by Luke, there is no one in the form of a “loud cry”, the Lucan emphasis appropriate for Jesus’ last word becomes greater – cf. R. E. Brown, Death, II, 1067 n. 96.
 Cf. the note 13.
 See F. Blass - A. Debrunner - F. Rehkopf [Bearb.], Grammatik, § 318.
 La Bible de Jérusalem (Paris 2003) ad loco (899-900) subdividing the verse introduces (maybe under influence of the masoretic accent rebia’) a full stop after “Yahvé”, and the subsequent phrase “Dieu de vérité” (“God of truth”) connects with the following verse (7). Anyhow it seems probable that some caesura between hw"hy> and tm,(a/ laeä is intended by the author of the Masoretic Text.
 The first time, in 10:21 (where at the end appears also o` path,r as substitution for the vocative pa,ter), “Father” occurs accompanied by the title “Lord of heaven and earth” (ku,rioj to.n ouvrano.n kai. th/j gh/j); in the subsequent occurrences (11:2; 22:42; 23:34a) the term “Father” remains independent. To the trustful prayer with the address “Father” on Jesus’ lips there corresponds, as a compatible, dialogical counterpart, the declaration of a “voice from heaven” at the baptism of Christ: “You are my beloved Son; in You I am well pleased” (3:22) – cf. C. G. Bartholomew – R. Holt, “Prayer in/and the Drama of Redemption in Luke: Prayer and Exegetical Performance”, in: C. G. Bartholomew – J. B. Green – A. C. Thiselton (ed.), Reading Luke. Interpretation, Reflection, Formation (Grand Rapids 2005) 358.
 R. E. Brown, Death, II, 1068 widening his view on the whole gospel, indicates also an extensive inclusion reaching from the first words of Jesus in Luke (2:49) to His last words on the cross (23:46).
 J. A. Fitzmyer, Gospel, II, 1519.
 F. Blass - A. Debrunner - F. Rehkopf [Bearb.], Grammatik, 176 (§ 217).
 Cf. ibid., § 217,2.
 R. E. Brown, Death, II, 1068.
 J. A. Fitzmyer, Gospel, II, 1519.
 R. E. Brown, Death, II, 1068; cf. J. Ernst, Das Evangelium nach Lukas (Regensburg 1997) 432; E. Schweizer, pneu/ma, in: Theologisches Wörterbuch zum Neuen Testament, VI, 330 - 453, 413.
 Cf. the corresponding portrayal of Jesus’ death in Jn 19:30 (pare,dwken to. pneu/ma) in the light of Johannine pneumatology.
 Cf. J. A. Fitzmyer, Gospel, 193, 1519.
 Cf. J. Ernst, Evangelium, 432.
 A very suggestive example of that pattern–role of the Crucified gives Luke himself in Acts 7:59-60 picturing the martyrdom of Stephen - the protomartyr of Christianity. Dying, he says: “Lord Jesus, receive my spirit”, and then cries out with a loud voice (e;kraxen fwnh/| mega,lh|) the prayer of forgiveness for his murderers: “Lord, do not charge them with this sin”. Here, as in the passion narratives, we can see a reflexion of the OT passio iusti tradition – cf. R. Pesch, Markusevangelium, II, 495.
 J. A. Fitzmyer, Gospel, II, 1519. For the rabbinic sources, see H. L. Strack - P. Billerbeck, Kommentar zum Neuen Testament aus Talmud und Midrasch (München 102009) II, 269.
 See J. Ernst, Evangelium, 432; J. A. Fitzmyer, Gospel, II, 1519; broader discussion in R. E. Brown, Death, II, 1069.
 Cf. J. Ernst, Evangelium, 432.
 R. E. Brown, Death, II, 1069.
 E. Bianchi, “Modlitwa”, Encyklopedia chrześcijaństwa (Kielce 2000), 466-469, 468.